Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables

To: moore at cs.utk.edu (Keith Moore)
Subject: Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables
From: Bill Manning <bmanning at ISI.EDU>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:58:06 -0800 (PST)
Cc: dperkins at dsperkins.com (David T. Perkins), mcr at research.solidum.com (Michael Richardson), ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200102010134.UAA18631@astro.cs.utk.edu> from "Keith Moore" at Jan 31, 2001 08:34:15 PM

% 
% > On the list below, I believe that peer-to-peer applications like
% > napster can work in a NAT world. All you need is a registration
% > and rendezvous service to put the two peers together. 
% 
% why do people so often assume that there are *two* peers?
% 
% Ketih

'cause one entity does not a peering session make? :)
e.g.  it takes (at least) two to tango... or peer.

-- 
--bill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables
  - From: Keith Moore

References:
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables
  - From: Keith Moore

Prev by Date: Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables
Next by Date: Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables
Previous by thread: Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables
Next by thread: Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.