![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> No, I don't care that having a moderator-in-the-middle filtering > everything is in the spirit of the midcom charter and must be for my > own good. I _really_ don't like the concept of an IETF-approved > poster to a mailing list on an IETF-run server. Given how trivially easy it is to subscribe to midcom and other IETF mailing lists I'm not sure that it's appropriate to describe the filtering process as anything but completely loose. I'm also not certain that I see the value in having people who don't read a mailing list posting to it, but okay, whatever. Complain about Allisat if you will, but at least he was subscribed to the mailing lists to which he was posting (Peter Lewis and the folks at Upperside are just spammers). The mailing list as delivered unto us by the IETF administrator has a preset policy of holding email from someone not on the mailing list until it's released by an administrator. We can change that if people feel sufficiently strongly. Melinda
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.