Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables

To: Hilarie Orman <HORMAN at novell.com>
Subject: Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables
From: V Guruprasad <prasad at watson.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:12:46 -0500
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <sa794dec.031@prv-mail20.provo.novell.com>; from HORMAN@novell.com on Thu 2001.02.01 11:52:03 -0700
Mail-followup-to: Hilarie Orman <HORMAN at novell.com>, ietf at ietf.org
References: <sa794dec.031@prv-mail20.provo.novell.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2i


On Thu, 2001.02.01, Hilarie Orman wrote:

> Dave Cheriton's TRIAD is an example of such a proposal.
> 
> Hilarie
> 
> >>> Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net> 02/01/01 11:05AM >>>
> At 03:05 PM 1/31/2001 -0800, Ed Gerck wrote:
> >You miss at least one other possibility.  If it is possible to develop
> >an addressing scheme that works in a heterogeneous network, then
> >we can have point-to-point functionality across system borders and
> >do not require a homogeneous address space to do so.

Nimrod, not Triad - fails heterogeneity.

-p.

References:
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables
  - From: Hilarie Orman

Prev by Date: Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd)
Previous by thread: Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables
Next by thread: Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.