![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:26:07AM -0800, James P. Salsman wrote: > > Who are these people? > > Perhaps they are from the majority of humans who use languages > written with glyphs absent from ASCII (and I don't mean Smalltalk-79.) > > Or maybe they have a pressing need to use the International > Phonetic Alphabet entities because the "new economy" synchronous > telephony systems are insufficiently more useful than ordinary > "old economy" synchronous telephony systems, and the only way > some of the necessary engineering staff will ever get interested > in asynchronous telephony is if they get to use the IPA for their > latest compression schemes. > > Maybe they want to be able to include UNICODE art, which is much > like ASCII art but more creative. > > Whoever they are, and whatever they want, they will probably agree > that also having an English version, in ASCII, in addition to the > non-ASCII version if there is one, is a good thing. So what's stopping them from doing that now? I've seen versions of RFCs on the net where someone has either included comments in the document or translated it. I've even seen Powerpoint versions of an RFC. You could even put a pointer to it in the document itself. Since I use "Marshall's XML Stuff" I end up with the text version as well as an HTML version which I put up on cnrp.net. I could even imagine a slight change to the artwore tag to allow multiple representations of the artwork depending on the intended output. I send in the ASCII text since its canonical and make the other versions available for those that need it. Seems pretty simple to me.... -MM P.S. Until you can get /bin/vi to correctly handle the entire Unicode standard (BIDI), IMHO, 'UNICODE art' is up there with transporters and Faster Than Light warp engines.... -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael Mealling | Vote Libertarian! | www.rwhois.net/michael Sr. Research Engineer | www.ga.lp.org/gwinnett | ICQ#: 14198821 Network Solutions | www.lp.org | michaelm at netsol.com
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.