Re: HTML better for small PDAs

[John Stracke <francis at ecal.com>]

graham.travers at BT.COM wrote:

> Yes, I have already conceded that we need a "master copy"

The point is that, if there exists a non-master copy that's easier for some
people to read, they won't read the master.  If the non-master copy doesn't
agree with the master (and many of them won't), then these people *will* make
mistakes, and create non-interoperable implementations.  It won't even be their
fault; they're using the tools that were provided.

--
/================================================================\
|John Stracke    | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.  |
|Chief Scientist |===============================================|
|eCal Corp.      |All I ask is a chance to prove that money can't|
|francis at ecal.com|make me happy.                                 |
\================================================================/