![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Mohsen BANAN-Public wrote: > Did you follow the discussions that I initiated on > a similar set of topics on the ietf at ietf.org > mailing lists about two years ago? Nope, but what was the conclusion? Where (URL) is it archived? Basically, my question was because of IAB's assertion in RFC-2826 "IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root" ( http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2826.html ) > Bob Allisat <bob at fcn.net> followed up on that idea... I am not aware that he is interested in the technical aspect of DNS. > I am also interested in the answer to your question. >Rahmat> - is there any WG, or organization, or list, or whatever >Rahmat> which is actively discussing the TECHNICAL (not political) >Rahmat> aspect of how a new DNS scheme should be? Perhaps, we should discuss this in private. What I have in mind is somewhat of an "address book" that is publicly accessible, perhaps through an ordinary DNS. Since it is publicly accessible, it can be shared/adopted by others. But, still there will be a legal issue here. Since XYZZY lawyers believe that they are entitled to XYZZY.com, XYZZY.net, XYZZY.org, XYZZY.any.other.TLD, do they have right over the XYZZY definition in my private address book? regards, -- Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim - VLSM-TJT - http://rms46.vlsm.org - Jangan,jangan,samakan;VLSM-TJT dengan yang lain! A.Rafiq
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.