Re: draft-many-gmpls-architecture-00.txt

To: jnc at ginger.lcs.mit.edu, Eric.Mannie at ebone.com
Subject: Re: draft-many-gmpls-architecture-00.txt
From: Bob Braden <braden at ISI.EDU>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 20:10:45 GMT
Cc: ietf at ietf.org

  *> 26 authors indeed, you forgot one :-)
  *> 
  *> It simply shows the interest of the community for that work !
  *> 
  *> Rgds,
  *> 
  *> Eric (the mad-editor-trying-to-synchronize-everything :-)
  *> 

Based on that criterion, we can expect that some future RFCs will
have hundreds of authors? Maybe we should include as authors everyone
on the relevant working group mailing list?  One would have to
presume they are all interested.

I agree with Noel's implication: are the Internet Drafts and RFCs
becoming a vanity press?

Bob Braden

Follow-Ups:
- Re: draft-many-gmpls-architecture-00.txt
  - From: Valdis . Kletnieks

Prev by Date: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-many-gmpls-architecture-00.txt
Next by Date: note from the operational side of the house
Previous by thread: draft-many-gmpls-architecture-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: draft-many-gmpls-architecture-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: draft-many-gmpls-architecture-00.txt

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.