![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Jiri Kuthan wrote: [..] > I would like to re-raise the question: > > "is anyone aware of any estimations of fraction of Internet users > who are behind firewalls and NATs?" So, this question piqued my interest. Figured I'd take a bash at estimating NAT usage using the online QuakeIII community as a reference. Cobbled together two Q3 servers, logged client port numbers, and looked for NAPT 'fingerprint' of clients coming in on unexpected UDP ports (Q3 client side seems to always use 27960 if not mangled by NAPT). Using an indirect, and somewhat arm-wavy method I estimate between 18 and 19% of the players on my servers were behind NAT boxes. A bit more discussion is at: http://members.home.net/garmitage/things/nat-quake3.html (Usual caveats: analysis may have entirely missed the point, clicking on the link voids your warranty, life is too short, etc..) cheers, gja ________________________________________________________________________ Grenville Armitage http://members.home.net/garmitage/
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.