![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Thu, 05 Apr 2001 11:53:14 +0700, "Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim" said: > > for the source wasn't acceptable). You only need take "prudent steps" > > for one year to ensure the place you point people stays there. > > Section 3 of GPL http://gnux.vlsm.org/copyleft/gpl.txt has three > options, "a" (accompany with source code) , "b" (three years commitment > to distribute), and "c" (providing pointers). So, what is the problem > to choose one of them? The problem is that now I have a directory on the server that has a bunch of *.tar.gz files identical to the ones on ftp.gnu.org, that are *only* there because the GNU people said I have to distribute source, and that the fact that there are probably 327 GNU mirrors that are more likely to be there 3 years from now than the server I set up is irrelevant to the GNU people. And having distributed anything, I now get to keep track of *every package*, and whenever I remove that package (for instance, if I package GNU Make 3.78 to replace 3.77) I have to keep BOTH .tar.gz's. I've now got a make-3.77.tar.gz that I'm stuck with for another 2 1/2 years, a make-3.78.tar.gz I;'m stuck with for a bit longer, a make-3.78.1.tar.gz, and I can't get rid of make-3.79.1.tar.gz for 3 years still. If I had built a 3.79 I'd be stuck with that one too... The problem is that when you take *that* stuff into account, I've spent (or have committed to spending) *more* time trying to comply with the GPL than I have actually making useful things available. I quit after building only about 1/3 of the install kits for AIX that I could have, mostly because I was digging a maintenance issue. The problem is that people won't get the benefit of the other tools, just because I can't say "as built from source available at ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/foobar/foobar-1.3.tar.gz". So in this case, the GPL has worked against its intent - rather than set up a possible non-compliance 2 years from now because I may not *be* there anymore, I've respected the GPL's wishes by not distributing software. Anyhow, this has gotten far enough afield, and it's late... Valdis Kletnieks Operating Systems Analyst Virginia Tech
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.