Re: I-D archives available anywhere?

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: I-D archives available anywhere?
From: Ofer Inbar <cos at aaaaa.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:51:21 -0400
In-reply-to: <200106181703.f5IH3rB3011157@calcite.rhyolite.com>; from Vernon Schryver on Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:03:53AM -0600
Organization: American Association Against Acronym Abuse
References: <200106181703.f5IH3rB3011157@calcite.rhyolite.com>
Sender: cos at thwip.polyamory.org

Vernon Schryver <vjs at calcite.rhyolite.com> wrote:
> > ...
> > And *NO*, this is *NOT* a 'we need to use XML/HTML/etc' - we haven't waited
> > the requisite 6 months before re-starting that flame war. ;)
> 
> Let's keep our flame wars straight.  This is the scheduled start
> of the latest episode of "I-D's Should Not Be Expired."

Anyone for an FYI RFC, "IETF mailing list flame war glossary and schedule" ?

  --  Cos (Ofer Inbar)       --   cos at aaaaa.org  http://cos.polyamory.org/
  --  Exodus Communications  --  cos at exodus.net  http://www.exodus.net/
   "We all misuse the net for personal gain, one way or another."
       -- Larry Wall <lwall at netlabs.com>

References:
- Re: I-D archives available anywhere?
  - From: Vernon Schryver

Prev by Date: Re: I-D archives available anywhere?
Next by Date: Re: I-D archives available anywhere?
Previous by thread: Re: I-D archives available anywhere?
Next by thread: Re: I-D archives available anywhere?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: I-D archives available anywhere?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.