![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Moore" <moore at cs.utk.edu> To: "Vernon Schryver" <vjs at calcite.rhyolite.com> Cc: <ietf at ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 3:57 AM Subject: Re: I-D archives available anywhere? > > Let's keep our flame wars straight. This is the scheduled start > > of the latest episode of "I-D's Should Not Be Expired." > > maybe we need a FAC (Frequently Argued Controversies) file for the > IETF list. unlike an FAQ file which answers questions, an FAC file > would summarize each side of each argument. that way, we wouldn't > need to re-iterate those positions each time the topic came back > up - we could simply say "see [url]". I quite agree. And your proposal will open new era of discussion and argument culture. The FAC archive will help anyone who join the discussion a little bit late and will help any student who studies the technical background, and will help elaboration of discussion because people can concentrate their focus on the heart of a problem. Let's do so. ( and who ? :> ) Jiwoong
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.