![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> From: Brian E Carpenter <brian at hursley.ibm.com> > ... > Option 4 is not a separate option - it's a possible content > provider reaction to whichever of 1, 2 or 3 takes place. As > Mark pointed out, it has major scaling and trust model issues. > > If I'm right and OPES-like boxes are inevitable, maybe the > IETF needs to start pre-emptive work on Option 4. > ... > > What about option 4, "information publishers who don't like interference > > by transport providers use TLS/SSL to enforce actual end-to-end > > transmission of the content" ? As we gain experience in implementing > > TLS, this is a certainly a possibility! How about starting at home by turning on STARTTLS for this mailing list? Vernon Schryver vjs at rhyolite.com
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.