![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> What about option 4, "information publishers who don't like interference > by transport providers use TLS/SSL to enforce actual end-to-end > transmission of the content" ? As we gain experience in implementing > TLS, this is a certainly a possibility! so we increase the burden on publishers who want content integrity in the name of decreasing the burden on intermediaries who want to corrupt content? somehow that doesn't seem like a socially beneficial tradeoff. Keith
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.