![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Hi Michael, > I would like to start a discussion to gauge interest in > possibly having a BOF (note that nothing has been decided yet - > but starting with a mailing list and a web site seems to be a > good idea) at the London IETF meeting. > > The topic is "ABR to the Internet" - in fact, it's "ABR Explicit Rate > Feedback related mechanisms for the Internet". To quote from > the web site: > > The goal: A generic approach to ... > - identify relevant information > - propose a new protocol and/or changes to existing protocols > - propose ways to use specific information (endpoint behaviour) > to achieve a certain QoS gain > Don't think of it as strictly ABR-like (requiring per flow state). > Think of it as ECN with a finer granularity. This sounds like it could be part of the Next Steps in Signaling work, that has been proposed as a working group. I haven't heard of any progress in that area. Perhaps Allison M. is putting something together for that. br, John
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.