Re: OPES charter proposal again.

[Brian E Carpenter <brian at hursley.ibm.com>]

"Michael W. Condry" wrote:
> 
> At 02:45 AM 7/3/2001 +0100, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> >I do like the 'extend [..] the iCAP protocol without being obliged to
> >retain any level of compatibility with the current iCAP proposal.'
> >Fine, since iCAP's just an individual draft -- but isn't extending
> >without being compatible something only Microsoft is generally
> >regarded as being capable of doing?
> 
> That is not the intent. The intent is that the IETF process
> will be followed with regard to iCAP (not some other organization's
> process).

Not ECMA's, for example?

  Brian