Re: OPES charter proposal again.

To: Micah Beck <mbeck at ironglass.com>
Subject: Re: OPES charter proposal again.
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian at hursley.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 09:38:01 -0500
Cc: "James P. Salsman" <bovik at best.com>, ietf-openproxy at IMC.ORG, "Michael W. Condry" <condry at INTEL.COM>, ietf at ietf.org
Organization: IBM
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010704170516.03c58d78@FMSMSX63.intel.com> <027a01c10503$eb2cb120$0501a8c0@cs.utk.edu>

Micah,

Micah Beck wrote:
> 
> I would suggest to the advocates of the OPES working group that they
> reconsider the modification I suggested to the charter a while ago, and
> which generated almost no discussion:
> 
> Modify
> 
> "Intermediary services provided in this way are not
> transparent: They have to be authorized by either the
> content requestor or the provider, corresponding to
> who the service being provided for."
> 
> to read
> 
> "Intermediary services provided in this way are not
> transparent: They have to be authorized by the provider."
> 

I disagree. It isn't acceptable to remove the requestor from
the authorization loop in the general case.

   Brian

References:
- Re: OPES charter proposal again.
  - From: Michael W. Condry
- Re: OPES charter proposal again.
  - From: Micah Beck

Prev by Date: Re: OPES charter proposal again.
Next by Date: Re: OPES charter proposal again.
Previous by thread: Re: OPES charter proposal again.
Next by thread: RE: OPES charter proposal again.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: OPES charter proposal again.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.