![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
In message <v04220802b77bde136984 at [10.83.97.216]>, Steve Deering typed: >>We used to use "gateway" instead of "router" (and a few still do), and i lik the fact that if you type getaway by mistake you get what people are trying to do when they are routed ... i also like the fact that MOST fancy things we do in traffic treatment (firewall, diff/int serv, header compression, checksum) ignore this layering rubbish idea and look at the whole packet and the whole state of the systems where you need to......creating articifical monitor security/concurrency boundary crossings in component software was a terrible thing, and many modern OSs have got a long way away from it.... on reflection (pun intended): layering is a clothing methodology for people who live in fractal climates not a design pattern for correct or efficient communications systems.... cheers jon p.s. NCP in england is National Car Parks.
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.