Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers

To: Joe Touch <touch at ISI.EDU>
Subject: Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:20:04 -0700
Cc: ietf <ietf at ietf.org>
References: <10321.995534328@cs.ucl.ac.uk> <3B5C6A1C.5D7D8F8C@isi.edu>

> I.e., layering is, IMO at least, a model. Fine for describing things, but
> not necessarily a good blueprint for an implementation.

compilation systems can be constructed which will procuce efficient inlined
code for nicely modularized (layered) source.  just not for programs which
use type-free pointers and similar analysis-defeating features.

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers
  - From: Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers
  - From: Joe Touch

References:
- Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers
  - From: Jon Crowcroft
- Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers
  - From: Joe Touch

Prev by Date: Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers
Next by Date: Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers
Previous by thread: Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers
Next by thread: Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.