Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers

To: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>
Subject: Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers
From: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs at cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:28:07 -0700
Cc: Joe Touch <touch at ISI.EDU>, ietf <ietf at ietf.org>
Organization: Columbia University
References: <10321.995534328@cs.ucl.ac.uk> <3B5C6A1C.5D7D8F8C@isi.edu> <E15OlFM-000O1N-00@rip.psg.com>

Also seems to be a good electric fence - you can cross layers, but very
carefully.

Randy Bush wrote:
> 
> > I.e., layering is, IMO at least, a model. Fine for describing things, but
> > not necessarily a good blueprint for an implementation.
> 
> compilation systems can be constructed which will procuce efficient inlined
> code for nicely modularized (layered) source.  just not for programs which
> use type-free pointers and similar analysis-defeating features.
> 
> randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers
  - From: Randy Bush

References:
- Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers
  - From: Jon Crowcroft
- Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers
  - From: Joe Touch
- Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers
  - From: Randy Bush

Prev by Date: Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers
Next by Date: Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers
Previous by thread: Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers
Next by thread: Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: [Hist Trivia] IP Protocol Layers

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.