Re: IETF technical discussions

To: "ietf @ ietf . org" <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IETF technical discussions
From: Scott Brim <sbrim at cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 10:39:55 -0400
In-reply-to: <E7BB0E796757D411BC9A00105ACB123E34C580@ticsmtp1.innovation.siemens.ca>; from david.sharp@tic.siemens.ca on Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 08:36:33AM -0400
Mail-followup-to: Scott Brim <sbrim at cisco.com>, "ietf @ ietf . org" <ietf at ietf.org>
References: <E7BB0E796757D411BC9A00105ACB123E34C580@ticsmtp1.innovation.siemens.ca>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 08:36:33AM -0400, David Sharp apparently wrote:
> I think Mr. Agarwal was trying to make a point, that seems to have evaded
> Mr. Tveit Alvestrand. Apart from the unfortunate abuse of the mailing lists,
> with respect to viruses, there is not a lot of IETF "content" in this
> mailing list. I personally would like to see a much hirer focus of
> professional discussion on technical matters, Please.
> 	Regards 
> 	Dave B. Sharp

You need to decide what your particular area of focus is, and go to that
specific group.  The IETF is very results-oriented and this list is too
open-ended for most of its work.

References:
- IETF technical discussions
  - From: David Sharp

Prev by Date: ADSL
Next by Date: Re: Note Well
Previous by thread: IETF technical discussions
Next by thread: Re: Can we lock the f'ing door already?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: IETF technical discussions

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.