Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard

To: Lloyd Wood <L.Wood at eim.surrey.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 09:39:42 -0700
Cc: "Eamon O'Tuathail" <eamon.otuathail at clipcode.com>, ietf at ietf.org, iesg at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0109101557480.6197-100000@phaestos.ee.surrey .ac.uk>
References: <000001c13a08$9376f280$56c8fea9@central>

At 08:53 AM 9/10/2001, Lloyd Wood wrote:

I can't see feature negotiation working well in implementations; it's
nice in theory, but often problematic in practice. The feature

Then you should discuss such concerns about SOAP in a SOAP protocol development forum. This thread does not concern general SOAP issues.

One more time:

        Are there any technical problems with
        the specification that is under review?

d/

ps. the time for challenging the venue for this work was when it was initiated, not now.


----------
Dave Crocker  <mailto:dcrocker at brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking  <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253;  fax +1.408.273.6464

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
  - From: Larry Masinter
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
  - From: Lloyd Wood

References:
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
  - From: Eamon O'Tuathail

Prev by Date: RE: This really is worth your valuable time !!!
Next by Date: Re: Humour RFCs
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.