Re: Humour RFCs

To: Mareline Sheldon <marelines at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Humour RFCs
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:10:43 -0400
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Sep 2001 21:59:24 +0530." <006601c13a15$c2c26ad0$b4036c6b@Manav>
References: <006601c13a15$c2c26ad0$b4036c6b@Manav>

On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 21:59:24 +0530, Mareline Sheldon <marelines at yahoo.com>  said:
>  Hi,
>  I remember there exists a RFC on the etymology of the term "foo" and
>  "foo_bar". Similarly there exists RFCs 1149 and 2549 [Avian Carriers] which
>  nobody will ever implement :-)
>  (Ofcourse i heard that some linux enthusiasts actually tried to implement
>  rfc 2549). Is anybody aware of more such "humour" RFCs ??

Look in rfc-index.txt for publication dates of the form Apr-1-NNNN.


-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Operating Systems Analyst
				Virginia Tech

Attachment: pgpv8Rs0Zadm3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Humour RFCs
  - From: Mareline Sheldon

Prev by Date: Re: Humour RFCs
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: Humour RFCs
Next by thread: Re: Humour RFCs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Humour RFCs

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.