Re: Humour RFCs

To: "Mareline Sheldon" <marelines at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Humour RFCs
From: Edward Lewis <lewis at tislabs.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:22:46 -0400
Cc: <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <006601c13a15$c2c26ad0$b4036c6b@Manav>

At 12:29 PM -0400 9/10/01, Mareline Sheldon wrote:
> Hi,
> I remember there exists a RFC on the etymology of the term "foo" and
> "foo_bar". Similarly there exists RFCs 1149 and 2549 [Avian Carriers] which
> nobody will ever implement :-)

1149 has been implemented. See: http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/

> (Ofcourse i heard that some linux enthusiasts actually tried to implement
> rfc 2549). Is anybody aware of more such "humour" RFCs ??

Just about any one published on any April 1.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                NAI Labs
Phone: +1 443-259-2352                      Email: lewis at tislabs.com

You fly too often when ... the airport taxi is on speed-dial.

Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Humour RFCs
  - From: Jose Manuel Arronte Garcia
- Re: Humo[u]r RFCs
  - From: Sandy Wills

References:
- Humour RFCs
  - From: Mareline Sheldon

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: Humour RFCs
Next by thread: Re: Humo[u]r RFCs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Humour RFCs

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.