Re: Humour RFCs

To: "Mareline Sheldon" <marelines at yahoo.com>, <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Humour RFCs
From: Stephen McHenry <stephen at cacheware.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 10:56:03 -0700
In-reply-to: <006601c13a15$c2c26ad0$b4036c6b@Manav>

At 09:29 AM 9/10/2001, Mareline Sheldon wrote:

 Hi,
 I remember there exists a RFC on the etymology of the term "foo" and
 "foo_bar". Similarly there exists RFCs 1149 and 2549 [Avian Carriers] which
 nobody will ever implement :-)
 (Ofcourse i heard that some linux enthusiasts actually tried to implement
 rfc 2549). Is anybody aware of more such "humour" RFCs ??

Yes... search for the date April 1 - all such RFCs (to my knowledge) have been published on that date.

Stephen

Stephen McHenry
VP, Engineering/CTO

References:
- Humour RFCs
  - From: Mareline Sheldon

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: Humour RFCs
Next by thread: Re: Humour RFCs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Humour RFCs

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.