RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard

To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm at rational.com>
Subject: RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 11:33:15 -0700
Cc: ietf at ietf.org, iesg at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B103F8ABB4@SUS-MA1IT01>

At 11:09 AM 9/10/2001, Clemm, Geoff wrote:

When work is done in the context of an IETF working group, then
it is feasible to challenge the venue at the formation of the working
group.  Since "SOAP in BEEP" was not done in the context of an
IETF working group, I believe challenges to the venue are appropriate.

Note the date of the beep working group archive entry:

[BXXPwg] new version of soap over beep published
Marshall T. Rose <mrose+mtr.netnews at dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:17:54 -0700

2.5 months is plenty of time for problems to be considered.

d/

---------- Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker at brandenburg.com> Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com> tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.273.6464

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
  - From: hardie

References:
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
  - From: Clemm, Geoff

Prev by Date: RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.