Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard

[hardie at equinix.com]

Dave,
	This was put forward specifically as work reviewed
in the IETF but not the product of an IETF working group.
Is that in error?  Should this have been put forward as
the work of the beep working group?
			regards,
				Ted Hardie






> 
> At 11:09 AM 9/10/2001, Clemm, Geoff wrote:
> >When work is done in the context of an IETF working group, then
> >it is feasible to challenge the venue at the formation of the working
> >group.  Since "SOAP in BEEP" was not done in the context of an
> >IETF working group, I believe challenges to the venue are appropriate.
> 
> 
> Note the date of the beep working group archive entry:
> 
> >[BXXPwg] new version of soap over beep published
> >Marshall T. Rose <mrose+mtr.netnews at dbc.mtview.ca.us>
> >Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:17:54 -0700
> 
> 
> 2.5 months is plenty of time for problems to be considered.
> 
> d/
> 
> ----------
> Dave Crocker  <mailto:dcrocker at brandenburg.com>
> Brandenburg InternetWorking  <http://www.brandenburg.com>
> tel +1.408.246.8253;  fax +1.408.273.6464 
>