RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard

To: "Marshall T. Rose" <mrose+mtr.netnews at DBC.MTVIEW.CA.US>
Subject: RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
From: "Christian Huitema" <huitema at windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:13:43 -0700
Cc: <ietf at ietf.org>
Thread-index: AcE6TYZBzsDet06AReuFKOv5KWGRoAAAF3TA
Thread-topic: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard

> christian - i'd like to understand any technical concerns you might
> have on the "soap over beep" specification.

Well, I am mostly concerned to see "SOAP over BEEP" defined before we
define the alternative "SOAP over TCP". I mean, if we are transporting
opaque blobs of data between two points, TCP looks like a no-brainer...

-- Christian Huitema

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
  - From: Marshall T. Rose

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.