Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard

To: hardie at equinix.com
Subject: Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:27:46 -0700
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200109102113.OAA20391@nemo.corp.equinix.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010910113124.024ed3b0@dcrocker.net>

At 02:13 PM 9/10/2001, hardie at equinix.com wrote:

        This was put forward specifically as work reviewed
in the IETF but not the product of an IETF working group.
Is that in error?  Should this have been put forward as
the work of the beep working group?

Ted, the observation was about behavior, not formal mandate. It was presented to a relevant working group.

d/


----------
Dave Crocker  <mailto:dcrocker at brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking  <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253;  fax +1.408.273.6464

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
  - From: hardie

References:
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
  - From: hardie

Prev by Date: RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.