Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard

["Marshall T. Rose" <mrose+mtr.netnews at DBC.MTVIEW.CA.US>]

> > christian - i'd like to understand any technical concerns you might
> > have on the "soap over beep" specification.
>
> Well, I am mostly concerned to see "SOAP over BEEP" defined before we
> define the alternative "SOAP over TCP". I mean, if we are transporting
> opaque blobs of data between two points, TCP looks like a no-brainer...

christian - i'm interested only in the technical issues. i'll leave the
non-technical issues to others. as much as i'd enjoy have a concrete v.
abstract discussion, it's not time-effective.

so, while i do not wish to discourage your postings in any fashion, i would
be most appreciative if your reply to me would enumerate any technical
issues you see in the "soap over beep" specification. obviously, you should
feel free to send other messages/replies that more fully discuss issues
which are either non-technical or not specific to the "soap over beep"
specification.

thanks,

/mtr