![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:13:43 -0700, Christian Huitema wrote: >>Well, I am mostly concerned to see "SOAP over BEEP" defined >> before we define the alternative "SOAP over TCP". Is that the real root of your objections? It is obvious that a small SOAP over BEEP spec will be written quicker that a huge SOAP over TCP spec, since the latter has to effectively duplicate most of what is in RFC 3080. That is the whole reason we take a layering approach to these things and it is becoming clear it is better. Eamon
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.