Re: ietf/istf role in US Disaster?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ietf/istf role in US Disaster?

To: <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: Re: ietf/istf role in US Disaster?
From: "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony at atkielski.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 11:14:32 +0200
References: <E4E98DEBA2FDD411922B00E018043A7D73A2@brub100a.siemens.be>

Eric writes:

> I know of a major direct backbone connection in
> a near ISP (tens of Mbps) that didn't respond anymore.

Wow ... tens of Mbps counts as "major" in your part of the woods?

> What could have been the reason? Too much sudden traffic?
> Some strategic nodes destroyed? Bad re-routing?

Just watching streaming video can cripple a link that slow.

References:
- RE: ietf/istf role in US Disaster?
  - From: TOMSON ERIC

Prev by Date: RE: NOstrAdamus
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: RE: ietf/istf role in US Disaster?
Next by thread: RE: ietf/istf role in US Disaster?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.