Re: April Foolish

To: valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu, braden at ISI.EDU
Subject: Re: April Foolish
From: RFC Editor <rfc-ed at ISI.EDU>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ietf at ietf.org, rfc-ed at ISI.EDU

Thank you for bringing this to our attention.
It is being corrected.

RFC Editor

> From \rfc-ed at ISI.EDU  Mon Sep 10 09:05:18 2001
> From: Bob Braden <braden at ISI.EDU>
> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:03:39 GMT
> To: valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
> Subject: April Foolish
> Cc: ietf at ietf.org, rfc-ed at ISI.EDU
> X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
> Content-Length: 298
> 
> 
>   *> I'm still waiting
>   *> for somebody to tell me that RFC1098 was an even more subtle joke. ;)
>   *> 
> 
> 
> Neat point (as well as a good in-joke).  The date field in the RFC
> index for RFC 1098 is incorrect; we will change it to match RFC
> 1098 itself, which bears the date "April 1989".
> 
> RFC Editor
>

Prev by Date: Re: Are you possible a hacker? Call 415/553-7400
Next by Date: Re: Rumor about US disaster
Previous by thread: April Foolish
Next by thread: Humour RFCs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: April Foolish

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.