Re: Humour RFCs

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: Humour RFCs
From: John Stracke <francis at ecal.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 18:26:04 -0400
Organization: eCal Corp.
References: <v03130303b7c2a71c0736@[10.33.10.175]> <006101c13a36$a0d5dda0$f1040a0a@ver.megared.net.mx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i586; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1

Jose Manuel Arronte Garcia wrote:

or us people who don't have ths custom of the april's fool day, is
very, but very unpleasant to find a joke instead of a serious network
reference as in a RFC.

I suppose we could add a new category, Humor, and move the joke RFCs from Informational to Humor.

Or, better yet, Disinformational.

--
/===============================================================\
|John Stracke    | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own. |
|Chief Scientist |==============================================|
|eCal Corp.      |Reality is what refuses to go away when I stop|
|francis at ecal.com|believing in it.                              |
\===============================================================/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Humour RFCs
  - From: Michael H. Warfield

References:
- Re: Humour RFCs
  - From: Edward Lewis
- Re: Humour RFCs
  - From: Jose Manuel Arronte Garcia

Prev by Date: Re: Rumor about US disaster
Next by Date: Re: Abusive "rr.com" user
Previous by thread: Re: Humour RFCs
Next by thread: Re: Humour RFCs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Humour RFCs

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.