Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard



At 08:35 AM 9/12/2001, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
But you didn't respond to my comment that this issue *is* relevant to the Last Call precisely because there was no discussion whether the work should have been chartered in the first place, if it had been a WG submission.

While we are at it, we need to review the decision to permit specification of IP over more than one medium.


It is architecturally the same issue.

d/

ps. Your previous comment about IETF tendency to restrict options neglected to note that that is WITHIN a particular protocol. The IETF has NOT had a track record of restricting convergence choices.


---------- Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker at brandenburg.com> Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com> tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.273.6464




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.