Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard
At 08:35 AM 9/12/2001, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
But you didn't respond to my comment that this issue *is* relevant to the
Last Call precisely because there was no discussion whether the work
should have been chartered in the first place, if it had been a WG submission.
While we are at it, we need to review the decision to permit specification
of IP over more than one medium.
It is architecturally the same issue.
d/
ps. Your previous comment about IETF tendency to restrict options
neglected to note that that is WITHIN a particular protocol. The IETF has
NOT had a track record of restricting convergence choices.
----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker at brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.273.6464
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.