![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:08:11 PDT, Fred Baker said: > if you start babbling about ICANN boards we might kick you off the list. A case could be made that the ICANN board is at least somewhat an IETF concern, since we have a vested interest in making sure that there is at least enough cluons there to move the needle on the cluon fluxometer. We don't need them proposing technically unworkable schemes. Long-time IETF readers probably recognise Fred's comment as a *mostly* empty threat, considering the number of truly memorable net.kooks immortalized in the ietf+censored mailing list's filters. Of course, that was an older time, before the days of SirCam and other silicon-based posters of nonsense. The carbon-based posters were at least more random and less boring. Let's face it, the FlemBot, although annoying, was more interesting than Yet Another SirCam Posting - except for the rare attachments that rated an "Oh MY". Having said that, asking if it were permitted is probably a good idea, as it allows those of us with weaker cardiovascular systems to avoid the shock of a unexpectedly on-charter posting... ;) /Valdis (who admits to occasionally leaving cookies out for the trolls, even when he personally was low on cluons (which is most of the time ;) ) P.S. "Here troll troll troll... I have a nice chocolate chip cookie for you..."
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.