Re: CAN I POST A TECHNICAL QUESTION REGARDING DOMAIN NAME SERVERS HERE?

To: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu, Fred Baker <fred at cisco.com>
Subject: Re: CAN I POST A TECHNICAL QUESTION REGARDING DOMAIN NAME SERVERS HERE?
From: vint cerf <vcerf at MCI.NET>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:34:49 -0400
Cc: unknown158 at lycos.com, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200109210632.f8L6Wbr04954@foo-bar-baz.cc.vt.edu>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010920130659.04308200@mira-sjcm-2.cisco.com>

with apologies to IETFers and Fred Baker in particular:

recent ICANN nominations to Board service:

the PSO renominated me to serve on the board for another 3 years
the ASO nominated Lyman Chapin to serve for three years

vint cerf

At 02:32 AM 9/21/2001 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
>A case could be made that the ICANN board is at least somewhat an IETF
>concern, since we have a vested interest in making sure that there is
>at least enough cluons there to move the needle on the cluon fluxometer.
>We don't need them proposing technically unworkable schemes.

References:
- Re: CAN I POST A TECHNICAL QUESTION REGARDING DOMAIN NAME SERVERS HERE?
  - From: Fred Baker
- Re: CAN I POST A TECHNICAL QUESTION REGARDING DOMAIN NAME SERVERS HERE?
  - From: Valdis . Kletnieks

Prev by Date: The most authoritative Wine & Spirit Trade Fair in China
Next by Date: Re: Peer-to-peer
Previous by thread: Re: CAN I POST A TECHNICAL QUESTION REGARDING DOMAIN NAME SERVERS HERE?
Next by thread: Implementation Report Links
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: CAN I POST A TECHNICAL QUESTION REGARDING DOMAIN NAME SERVERS HERE?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.