RE: Acronyms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Acronyms

To: "Aronson, David" <daronson at cryptek.com>
Subject: RE: Acronyms
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 07:27:52 -0700
Cc: Jiwoong Lee <porce at ktf.com>, ietf at ietf.org
References: <8B204D152222D51182B700010288413720253F@POSTMASTER>

> Standard usage (in general, not just IDs and RFCs) is that if you're
> absolutely sure that your intended audience knows what you're talking about,
> you can omit the explanation, as I just did.

s/intended audience/all reasonable audiences who may need the document/

randy

References:
- RE: Acronyms
  - From: Aronson, David

Prev by Date: RE: Acronyms
Next by Date: I-D ACTION:draft-brezak-spnego-http-00.txt
Previous by thread: RE: Acronyms
Next by thread: new RFCs not showing up on IETF-Announce list?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.