![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-brezak-spnego-http-00.txt On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, John Brezak wrote: > Before jumping to conclusions, where is the offending character? In the first line of your abstract. The line was quoted for context. A 'smart' Apostrophe, very appropriately used. (If it was "IETF's", I'd wince.) The circumflex is repeated in the header lines; you probably see an em-dash. > I try to catch these, but sometimes they slip through. A little > context from the document will help me find them and correct them > for a subsequent submission to correct typos. I think it's reasonable to presume that you are familiar with your own document. I mean, it's only six pages, and there's almost no original content on three of them. L. IE5 supports Kerberos? Real Kerberos? <L.Wood at surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/> > -----Original Message----- > From: Garrett Wollman [mailto:wollman at khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:27 AM > To: John Brezak > Cc: ietf at ietf.org > Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-brezak-spnego-http-00.txt > > > <<On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:11:10 -0400, Internet-Drafts at ietf.org said: > > > This document describes how Microsoft\306s Internet Explorer 5.0 and > > This announcement continues a disturbing trend of MicrosoftSCII > appearing in what are supposed to be ASCII text documents. It's > particularly egregious in this announcement, since there is no > Content-Type header indicating in what character set the \306 should be > rendered. (In my system's default encoding, it's a capital > ae-ligature.) The document itself also contains \373 characters as well > (seen as u-circumflex). > > -GAWollman
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.