![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> How can this be issued with as a Proposed Standard RFC with a > field labeled TBD? If the ID is approved to be published as a PS, the RFC editor will work with IANA during the final stages of publication to ensure that the TBD value is replaced with an appropriate value. Thomas
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.