![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
That note mentioned ASN.1 and several others. Some language development that might be of interest that bridges both ASN.1 and XML can be found to various extents at: http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/en/xml/ http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20010807S0038 http://www.ddj.com/news/fullstory.cgi?id=4341 http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2001-02-28-e.html http://xml.coverpages.org/xer.html This ASN.1 XML standards work should be completed next week at an ASN.1 group meeting in Orlando, FL, then immediately balloted. I understand that tools support for this work is slated for fourth quarter 2001 delivery. There is a free tools list on the first site listed, which I believe offers several ASN.1 syntax checkers as well as pointers to other free and for sale tools. Some of these are general, others quite specialized. The new ITU-T ASN.1 Project is in the process of compiling a list of verified ASN.1 modules that are being made freely available to anyone at http://www.itu.int:2001/ITU-T/asn1/database/. Currently these seem to include only ITU-T specifications, but I do not know what their intended scope may be. An on line base of correct IETF ASN.1 modules would certainly be useful. A note to the web master or contact might reveal more. And of course, all of the ASN.1 and SDL standards are now freely available from the ITU-T web site. A revision of ASN.1 is currently underway that will incorporate all of the TCs and amendments into a new 2002 edition. Phil Griffin "Henning G. Schulzrinne" wrote: > > Recently, the IESG sent a note describing and encouraging the use of > formally verifiable means of protocol specification, in addition to > English prose. To facilitate this effort, I will be setting a resource > web page to provide information on mechanisms and tools. (Unless there > is a formal IETF effort, of course.) > > For now, please send me pointers to tools and possible languages or > other suitable means, including, for example, RFC 2234 (ABNF), ASN.1 as > used for LDAP and SNMP, or XML schemas. Note that these tools are meant > for verification, not for code generation. > > This is a "freelance" effort, and any statements or listings do not > necessarily reflect official IETF or IESG policy or recommendations. > > Thank you. > -- > Henning Schulzrinne http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.