![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks, Graham, for the pointer to yet a third possible alphabet. I think there may even be a fourth mentioned somewhere. Alexey Melnikov writes: > Gordon Mohr wrote: > > Any chance that the Josefsson I-D will become an RFC of > > any sort? > > There is a good chance that it will become RFC as a document of SASL Working > Group. (FYI, I can't find the SASL group at the IETF working-groups lists.) I would be really, REALLY interested in helping to make the Josefsson I-D the officially-sanctioned definition of "Base32", so that there will be no ambiguity in any future standards work/ applications. What's the best IETF venue for (and shortest path to) such a goal? - Gordon
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.