Re: W3C Fee based Patent Policy - RAND

To: Brian E Carpenter <brian at hursley.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: W3C Fee based Patent Policy - RAND
From: Franck Martin <franck at SOPAC.ORG>
Date: 04 Oct 2001 08:52:50 +0000
Cc: Shirley Tseng <shirleytseng at earthlink.net>, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <3BBAEB77.9E1EE046@hursley.ibm.com>
References: <NDBBLGAIACLIKKIHOHEHEEOICLAA.shirleytseng@earthlink.net> <3BBAEB77.9E1EE046@hursley.ibm.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

The review has been extended to allow more discussion, and the w3c explained that their RAND policy is nothing new, the IETF has a similar policy. Check the W3C web site for more info on the reference to IETF policy about standards and patents.

Cheers
Franck

On 03 Oct 2001 12:41:59 +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> I don't see what the W3C IPR policy has to do with the IETF, whose
> policy is defined (well, in my opinion) in RFC 2026.
> 
>     Brian
> 
> Shirley Tseng wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Was this discussed by the IETF or via the IETF/W3C liaison committee?  I
> > didn't see it in the archive.  The review period ends today!
> > 

>

References:
- W3C Fee based Patent Policy - RAND
  - From: Shirley Tseng
- Re: W3C Fee based Patent Policy - RAND
  - From: Brian E Carpenter

Prev by Date: Re: W3C Fee based Patent Policy - RAND
Next by Date: Re: hello see this (DRP)
Previous by thread: Re: W3C Fee based Patent Policy - RAND
Next by thread: RE: W3C Fee based Patent Policy - RAND
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: W3C Fee based Patent Policy - RAND

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.