Re: in memoriam

To: Einar Stefferud <stef at nma.com>
Subject: Re: in memoriam
From: Fred Baker <fred at cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 07:28:02 +1000
Cc: <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <v0422084cb7f43bce1a51@[192.168.1.14]>
References: <E15tsyH-000Pc6-00@rip.psg.com> <E15tZLm-000Gkm-00@rip.psg.com> <200110170236.AA00425@toru-biblo.riis.ad.jp> <E15tidd-0007Nx-00@rip.psg.com> <E15tsyH-000Pc6-00@rip.psg.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

At 06:05 PM 10/18/2001, Einar Stefferud wrote:

What I think is a real shame is that ICANN might be mistakenly
considered by some people to to be a monument to Jon Postel...

with all due respect, would you mind if I spent a few minutes thinking about Jon, the good things he did and left, and the good things we can do and leave while standing on his shoulders?

Take this other stuff somewhere else. I don't need you to ruin my day.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: in memoriam
  - From: Jim Fleming

References:
- Re: in memoriam
  - From: Randy Bush
- in memoriam
  - From: Randy Bush
- Re: in memoriam
  - From: Toru Takahashi
- Re: in memoriam
  - From: Randy Bush
- Re: in memoriam
  - From: Einar Stefferud

Prev by Date: Re: about 802.1x
Next by Date: RE: "...cast bright lights on all who would destroy freedom in th e world..."
Previous by thread: R.I.P IPv4....Re: in memoriam
Next by thread: Re: in memoriam
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: in memoriam

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.