Re: participation in IETF meetings

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: participation in IETF meetings
From: Melinda Shore <mshore at cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:18:15 -0400
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.2.20011023094254.01daaa60@10.30.15.3>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0110231223330.24942-100000@phaestos.ee.surre y.ac.uk> <260180000.1003828612@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

At 09:49 AM 10/23/01 -0400, RJ Atkinson wrote:
>        While I disagree with the first sentence above, I agree that
>on Tuesdays and Thursdays I think it actually be productive to dispense 
>with the wireless LAN coverage in meeting rooms.  

It's useful for people to be able to grab documents while the
meeting is in progress, I've found.  That said, I think it's
perfectly reasonable in a crowded meeting to demand the seat of
someone who's playing games or checking their stock portfolio,
or otherwise choosing to screw around with their laptop rather than
participate in what's going on in the room.

Melinda

References:
- Re: Multicast channels at the 52nd IETF
  - From: Harald Alvestrand
- Re: participation in IETF meetings
  - From: RJ Atkinson

Prev by Date: Re: participation in IETF meetings
Next by Date: Re: participation in IETF meetings
Previous by thread: Re: participation in IETF meetings
Next by thread: Re: participation in IETF meetings
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: participation in IETF meetings

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.