Re: participation in IETF meetings

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: participation in IETF meetings
From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman at IMC.ORG>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:23:06 -0700
In-reply-to: <3BD5AD14.4060605@isi.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0110231223330.24942-100000@phaestos.ee.surre y.ac.uk> <260180000.1003828612@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no> <5.0.2.1.2.20011023103611.02992610@uniwest1> <3BD5AD14.4060605@isi.edu>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

Going back to the original question about more multicast sessions:

The advantage of multicast vs. tape-and-archive is the real-time aspect for the viewer. However, this is rarely, rarely used. If it turns out that switching from multicast to tape-and-archive can get more camera operators in more rooms, that would be a win for more WGs.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium

Follow-Ups:
- Re: participation in IETF meetings
  - From: Aaron Falk
- Re: participation in IETF meetings
  - From: Daniel Senie

References:
- Re: Multicast channels at the 52nd IETF
  - From: Harald Alvestrand
- Re: participation in IETF meetings
  - From: Kastenholz, Frank
- Re: participation in IETF meetings
  - From: Joe Touch

Prev by Date: Re: participation in IETF meetings
Next by Date: Re: participation in IETF meetings
Previous by thread: Re: participation in IETF meetings
Next by thread: Re: participation in IETF meetings
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: participation in IETF meetings

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.