Re: earlier agendas

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: earlier agendas
From: "John Stracke" <jstracke at incentivesystems.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 08:56:38 -0500
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

Radia Perlman wrote:

>Perhaps starting out with
>a 15 minute explanation of what the current controversies are.

Or, alternatively, providing such an explanation on the WG's Web page, so 
people can read it in advance rather than taking up meeting time.

/================================================================\
|John Stracke                    |Principal Engineer             |
|jstracke at incentivesystems.com   |Incentive Systems, Inc.        |
|http://www.incentivesystems.com |My opinions are my own.        |
|================================================================|
|"I said no camels! That's 5 camels! Can't you count?" -- Indiana|
|Jones & TLC                                                     |
\================================================================/

Prev by Date: Re: Why is IPv6 a must?
Next by Date: Re: earlier agendas --> moving the thread to a new list
Previous by thread: Re: earlier agendas
Next by thread: RE: earlier agendas
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: earlier agendas

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.