Re: ipv6 adoption....

To: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Subject: Re: ipv6 adoption....
From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood at eim.surrey.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 17:46:16 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema at windows.microsoft.com>, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200111141610.fAEGABT09035@astro.cs.utk.edu>
Organization: speaking for none
Reply-to: Lloyd Wood <L.Wood at eim.surrey.ac.uk>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Keith Moore wrote:

> > But the IETF list is probably not the best place for an opinion contest
> > about the deployment of IPv6.
> 
> true.  but at the same time, it's good for the wider IETF community to 
> discuss the state of IPv6 and the issues associated with deployment,
> because it's not just IPv6 experts that need to be familiar with these
> things.  and having such a discussion inherently means that opinions
> are going to be expressed.

okay, I'll bite.

since when did the wider IETF community (if, indeed, there is such a
thing) read ietf at ietf.org? the wider IETF community probably just
reads a couple of workgroups...

L.

<L.Wood at surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>

Follow-Ups:
- Who cares about ietf at ietf.org, anyway? (was Re: ipv6 adoption....)
  - From: John W Noerenberg II

References:
- Re: ipv6 adoption....
  - From: Keith Moore

Prev by Date: Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?
Next by Date: Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?
Previous by thread: Re: ipv6 adoption....
Next by thread: Who cares about ietf at ietf.org, anyway? (was Re: ipv6 adoption....)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: ipv6 adoption....

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.