Re: Why is IPv6 a must?

To: "J. Noel Chiappa" <jnc at ginger.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Why is IPv6 a must?
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:43:02 -0800
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200111120519.AAA24064@ginger.lcs.mit.edu>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

At 12:19 AM 11/12/2001 -0500, J. Noel Chiappa wrote:

How does the fact that they are somewhat unrelated issues in any way refute
the criticism of IPv6 regarding its lack of a solution to routing issues?


The list of items to criticize is far longer than just the item you cite.

For example if we stick with your logic, we also need to criticize IPv6 for not solving world peace. After all, it was not on the agenda for v6, either, and sure enough, v6 didn't solve it.

d/


----------
Dave Crocker  <mailto:dcrocker at brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking  <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253;  fax +1.408.273.6464

References:
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?
  - From: J. Noel Chiappa

Prev by Date: Re: Why is IPv6 a must?
Next by Date: Re: internet-drafts at ietf.org is broken
Previous by thread: Re: Why is IPv6 a must?
Next by thread: Re: Why is IPv6 a must?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Why is IPv6 a must?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.