RE: Why IPv6 is a must?

[Julia Finnegan <julia.finnegan at aegis-inc.com>]

Cheese... this helps... I know it sounds crazy- but it works... but only
brie.

-----Original Message-----
From: Meritt James [mailto:meritt_james at BAH.COM]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:33 AM
To: erosen at cisco.com
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: Why IPv6 is a must?


I wish to express doubt on the (as you mentioned in an aside) there
should be.  Consider what these addresses would be for and the
implications of THAT.

Eric Rosen wrote:
> 
> Sure, in  theory one could add  zillions of new  globally routable
addresses
> without increasing the  size of the routing tables  in the default-free
zone
> at all.
> 
> The skepticism is about whether there is (or even could be) a realistic
plan
> to make this happen.

-- 
James W. Meritt CISSP, CISA
Booz | Allen | Hamilton
phone: (410) 684-6566