Re: Why IPv6 is a must?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why IPv6 is a must?



% At 8:36 AM -0500 11/29/01, Eric Rosen wrote:
% >Sure, in  theory one could add  zillions of new  globally routable addresses
% >without increasing the  size of the routing tables  in the default-free zone
% >at all. 
% >
% >The skepticism is about whether there is (or even could be) a realistic plan
% >to make this happen.
% 
% What's the realistic plan to prevent the IPv4 routing table from growing
% to 2^32 route entries?
% 
% Steve

	trolling again? :)
	Nothing, as long as I don't mind lengthy convergence times.

--bill




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.